We aim to make this site as accessible as possible and therefore have provided the settings below to use if you are finding it difficult to view this website. See the SFO Accessibility Statement for more information.

Where it is appropriate to provide a Welsh translation, you can switch to Cymraeg. See the Welsh Language Commissioner website for more information.

Use the settings button in the bottom right corner of the page to access these settings again.

We would like to use Analytics Cookies on our website. 

Turn these on below if you are happy with us collecting information on how our site is used, in order for us to improve the overall experience of our website. 

All other cookies are necessary and therefore by continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to the usage of these cookies.

 See the SFO Privacy Policy for more information. 

Analytics Cookies

Further charge against individual in SFO’s Unaoil investigation

21 Rhagfyr, 2018 | Case Updates

The Serious Fraud Office has further charged Stephen Whiteley with conspiracy to make corrupt payments in relation to the SFO’s Unaoil investigation.

The SFO alleges Mr Whiteley assisted Unaoil Limited to be engaged as a subcontractor for an oil pipeline project in Iraq.  The alleged conduct took place between March 2009 and May 2010.

Stephen Whiteley has been charged with one offence of conspiracy to make corrupt payments, contrary to section (1) of the Criminal Law Act 1977 and contrary to section 1 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906.

Stephen Whiteley was charged by requisition and will appear before Westminster Magistrates’ Court at 10am on Wednesday, 9 January 2019.

Notes to editors:

  1. The SFO opened its investigation into Unaoil in March 2016.
  2. Mr Whiteley was previously charged with one count of the same offence for alleged corrupt payments to secure the award of contracts in Iraq to Unaoil’s client SBM Offshore. He faces two counts altogether.
  3. Details of other individuals charged in relation to this investigation can be found here.
  4. The strict liability rule in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 applies.