To make this site simpler, we place small data files on your computer known as cookies. Most of our cookies are strictly necessary in order for the website to function correctly and these cookies do not store any of your personal data.

We also allow you to choose whether to allow Google Analytics cookies or not. Google Analytics cookies improve our understanding of how you use the website so we can make sure it meets your needs. If you should choose to accept the Google Analytics cookie, we will still anonymise all data collected.

Click here to find out more on the SFO's privacy policy and use of cookies.

Off
On
Save and Close
Analytics Cookies

Landmark High Court win for the SFO

28 Ionawr, 2016 | Eitemau newyddion

The High Court yesterday ruled in favour of the SFO over the way it handles the identification of material potentially subject to Legal Professional Privilege (LPP).

This significant ruling follows a challenge at the High Court by an individual, Colin McKenzie, who is the subject of an SFO investigation.

Mr McKenzie claimed that the SFO’s procedure, as set out in the SFO’s Operational Handbook and the Attorney General’s Supplementary Guidelines on Digitally Stored Material (2011) (which appear as an Annex to the 2013 Guidelines on Disclosure), for isolating material potentially subject to LPP, for the purpose of making it available to an independent lawyer for review, is unlawful.

The High Court disagreed. It held that that the SFO’s use of in-house technical experts to isolate material potentially subject to LPP was lawful and that it did not therefore need rely on external contractors to do this work. This judgment is significant both to the SFO and other law enforcement bodies.

For the full judgment please visit the Judiciary website. The SFO was awarded its costs and was represented in court by Jonathan Hall QC of 6KBW College Hill and James Segan of Blackstone Chambers.